[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:05:27 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Surendra Patil <surendra.tux@...il.com>
Cc: rupesh.gujare@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers:staging:ozwpan Replaced wrapper functions with
actual spin lock function calls
This patch introduces a bug.
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 06:59:20PM -0800, Surendra Patil wrote:
> Replaced all the spin lock/unlock wrappers from oz_polling_lock_bh()
> and oz_polllin_unlock_bh() with spin_lock_bh(&g_polling_lock) and
> spin_unlock_bh(&g_polling_lock).Completely erased the wrappers defination
> and declaration.
> Module builded successfully with sparse without warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Surendra Patil <surendra.tux@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozproto.c | 9 ---------
> drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozproto.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.c b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.c
> index 7436950..66c3a2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozpd.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>
> #define OZ_MAX_TX_POOL_SIZE 6
>
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(g_polling_lock);
This doesn't work. Now you have two lock variables which just happen to
have the same name.
You need to make the original g_polling_lock not static and add a
declaration to the header file.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists