linux-kernel - Re: Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2014 23:39:02 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:23:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> This just uses a "flags" field, and we currently only have two bits
> that we use: FDPUT_FPUT and FDPUT_POS_UNLOCK. The first patch knows
> that "fget_light()" writes 0/1 for that, which is the same as the
> FDPUT_FPUT bit. I didn't bother to comment on it or clean it up, since
> the second patch just removes that whole fget_light() mess.
> 
> Comments?

do_sendfile() is also there and this one is even more unpleasant ;-/
We probably can ignore that one (until POSIX learns of its existence),
thouhg...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/