[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:54:29 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> do_sendfile() is also there and this one is even more unpleasant ;-/
> We probably can ignore that one (until POSIX learns of its existence),
> thouhg...
Yeah, I saw the do_sendfile one and decided we don't care. Not only is
is out of POSIX spec (so if you break it you get to keep both pieces),
the whole sendfile() thing is a bit of a hack.
But we could take the f_pos_lock explicitly in do_sendfile for the
!ppos case if we decide we care. The error handling is the main
annoyance.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists