linux-kernel - Re: nouveau crash due to missing channel (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.12.12-rt19)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:53:57 +0100
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
Cc:	Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...ma.Stanford.EDU>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: nouveau crash due to missing channel (WAS: Re: [ANNOUNCE]
 3.12.12-rt19)

* Maarten Lankhorst | 2014-03-07 12:36:13 [+0100]:

>>I can't find any kind of locking so my question is what ensures that chan is
>>not set to NULL between nouveau_fence_done() and
>>nouveau_fence_wait_uevent()? There are just a few opcodes in between but
>>nothing that pauses nouveau_fence_signal().
>Absolutely nothing. :-) Worse still, there's no guarantee that channel isn't freed, but hopefully that is less likely to be an issue.

Okay, so I hit the correct spot. What do we do here? Do you want the
patch I posted without the WARN_ON() or do you prefer to fix this in an
other way?

>~Maarten

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/