linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:07:02 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: davinci: fix gpio selection for OF

On Monday 17 March 2014 07:35 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> wrote:
> 
>> One thing to note is that this driver is used by keystone too and all
>> its users are DT-only. Although I do not see any in-kernel DT GPIO users
>> even there.
>>
>> I can confirm the patch does not break my gpiolib based test module
>> (test with and without DT), but then it did not have an issue even before.
> 
> Is that a Tested-by tag? :-)

Yes.

Tested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>

> 
> If you're also convinced that fix is safe I'll push it as a fix to v3.14-rcN
> if for nothing else so for getting Mr. Holler to stop poking me in the
> chest.

It is safe - at the least it does not break anything that is already
working. I guess the decision to put it into -rc depends on whether you
consider out of tree dtbs to be a valid usecase for the kernel.

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/