[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:13:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86: reboot doesn't reboot
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Keep in mind we already tried CF9 in the default flow and it broke
> things. I'm willing to wait for reports about production machines,
> though, but I fully expect them.
Typically there's nothing particularly weird about preproduction Intel
hardware when it comes to reboot methods, other than people more
willing to test them with development kernels.
Is there any system were the triple fault method does not work?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists