lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 05 Apr 2014 23:47:04 +0200
From:	Thomas Bächler <thomas@...hlinux.org>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	ak@...ux.intel.com
CC:	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpowa@...hlinux.org
Subject: Re: 3.13: <module> disagrees about version of symbol <symbol>

Am 05.04.2014 19:23, schrieb Tetsuo Handa:
> Thomas B臘hler wrote:
>>>> For convenience, here is a copy-and-paste of the full text:
>>>
>>> I did some experiments know and I can't find any 32bit modules 
>>> that do not load with 32bit MODVERSIONS on or off with 
>>> a current tree.
>>>
>>> Do you have a specific config?
>>> Specific compiler version?
>>
>> Using gcc 4.8 from Arch Linux with the configuration at [1] and Linux 3.14.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/config?h=packages/linux
>>
> 
> I installed ArchLinux i686 and compiled
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/linux-3.14.tar.xz using [1]
> as of commit bbf3d68a without any changes.
> 
> It seems to me that everything is working well.
> Which modules you cannot load?

If I remove the revert of the offending commit, it fails loading ext4,
among others.



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (902 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ