linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/15 V3] perf, c2c: Add in new options to configure latency and stores

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 6 Apr 2014 15:14:22 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc:	acme@...stprotocols.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jmario@...hat.com, fowles@...each.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	eranian@...gle.com, andi.kleen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15 V3] perf, c2c: Add in new options to configure
 latency and stores

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:55:35PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 06:11:38PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:36:57PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > Modified the code to allow latency settings to be tweaked on the command line
> > > and also the ability to dynamically profile stores (or disable using stores).
> > > 
> > > This allows the tool to be used on older Intel platforms like Westmere.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > SNIP
> > 
> > > @@ -316,6 +369,12 @@ int cmd_c2c(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> > >  	};
> > >  	const struct option c2c_options[] = {
> > >  	OPT_BOOLEAN('r', "raw_records", &c2c.raw_records, "dump raw events"),
> > > +	OPT_INTEGER('l', "latency-level", &lat_level,
> > > +		 "specify the latency threshold for loads [default=30]"),
> > > +	OPT_INTEGER('p', "precision-level", &prec_level,
> > > +		 "specify the precision level of events (0,1,2,3) [default=1]"),
> > 
> > could we get also option for user space modifier?
> 
> You mean the 'u' modifier, ie cpu/mem-loads/u ?  If so, then I can do that
> but will that work with the -a option (which is hardcoded in the c2c
> tool [system-wide mode])?

right, forgot about that.. could the -a option be optional as well?
probably the same way as for record would be the best:

  perf c2c record ./foo       # workload specific
  perf c2c record -a sleep 3  # system wide

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/