linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] edac: altera: Add SDRAM EDAC support for CycloneV/ArriaV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:57:39 -0500
From:	Thor Thayer <tthayer@...era.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:	<robherring2@...il.com>, <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	<galak@...eaurora.org>, <rob@...dley.net>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <dinguyen@...era.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] edac: altera: Add SDRAM EDAC support for
 CycloneV/ArriaV

On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 12:08 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 04:54:09PM -0500, tthayer@...era.com wrote:
> > From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@...era.com>
> > 
> > Added EDAC support for reporting ECC errors of CycloneV
> > and ArriaV SDRAM controller.
> > - The SDRAM Controller registers are used by the FPGA bridge so
> >   these are accessed through the syscon interface.
> > - The configuration of the SDRAM memory size for the EDAC framework
> >   is discovered from the memory node of the device tree.
> > - Documentation of the bindings in devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/
> >   socfpga-sdram-edac.txt
> > - Correction of single bit errors, detection of double bit errors.
> 
> Before I go and take a look at this further, is anyone at Altera going
> to maintain this driver in case of bug reports and issues with it?

Yes, Altera has a group specifically supporting Linux drivers on the
Altera SoCs.

> 
> Also, I see patch 3/3. Are the other two related? I see they are
> devicetree additions and, as such, all three should go together...
> 

I was told that the device tree additions should be separate patches in
a series since the device tree additions go to a separate group for
approval.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/