linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Apr 2014 17:10:56 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:25:01AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
> As I understand it, the license authors. They find it important to maintain
> clarity even when files get copied into other projects.
> 
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
> 
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NoticeInSourceFile

Right, so what is wrong with stating the same thing in two lines:

"Copyright (c) 2011-2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.

This file is licensed under GNU GPLv2. See COPYING for full license text."

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/