| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:06:45 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 14/14] tracing: Get trace_array ref counts
when accessing trace files
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 12:52:04 -0400
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 12:36 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:59:10 -0400
> > Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/02/2013 04:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >>>
> >>> When a trace file is opened that may access a trace array, it must
> >>> increment its ref count to prevent it from being deleted.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.10
> >>> Reported-by: Alexander Lam <azl@...gle.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >>
> >> Hi Steven,
> >>
> >> This patch seems to cause the following lockdep warning:
> >>
> >> [ 5644.288019] ======================================================
> >> [ 5644.288771] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> >> [ 5644.289657] 3.14.0-next-20140403-sasha-00019-g7474aa9-dirty #376 Not tainted
> >> [ 5644.290568] -------------------------------------------------------
> >> [ 5644.290783] trinity-c17/19105 is trying to acquire lock:
> >> [ 5644.290783] (trace_types_lock){+.+.+.}, at: trace_array_get (kernel/trace/trace.c:225)
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] but task is already holding lock:
> >> [ 5644.290783] (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: prepare_bprm_creds (fs/exec.c:1165)
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> -> #2 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}:
> >> [ 5644.290783] lock_acquire (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602)
> >> [ 5644.290783] mutex_lock_interruptible_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:486 kernel/locking/mutex.c:616)
> >> [ 5644.290783] proc_pid_attr_write (fs/proc/base.c:2250)
> >> [ 5644.290783] __kernel_write (fs/read_write.c:457)
> >> [ 5644.290783] write_pipe_buf (fs/splice.c:1072)
> >> [ 5644.290783] splice_from_pipe_feed (fs/splice.c:834)
> >> [ 5644.290783] __splice_from_pipe (fs/splice.c:955)
> >> [ 5644.290783] splice_from_pipe (fs/splice.c:990)
> >> [ 5644.290783] default_file_splice_write (fs/splice.c:1084)
> >> [ 5644.290783] SyS_splice (include/linux/fs.h:2333 fs/splice.c:1391 fs/splice.c:1764 fs/splice.c:1749)
> >> [ 5644.290783] tracesys (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749)
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> -> #1 (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.+.}:
> >> [ 5644.290783] lock_acquire (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602)
> >> [ 5644.290783] mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:486 kernel/locking/mutex.c:587)
> >> [ 5644.290783] pipe_lock_nested (fs/pipe.c:61)
> >> [ 5644.290783] pipe_lock (fs/pipe.c:69)
> >> [ 5644.290783] splice_to_pipe (include/linux/wait.h:103 fs/splice.c:247)
> >> [ 5644.290783] tracing_buffers_splice_read (kernel/trace/trace.c:5423)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_splice_to (fs/splice.c:1151)
> >> [ 5644.290783] SyS_splice (fs/splice.c:1416 fs/splice.c:1764 fs/splice.c:1749)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ia32_sysret (arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S:430)
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> -> #0 (trace_types_lock){+.+.+.}:
> >> [ 5644.290783] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1840 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182)
> >> [ 5644.290783] lock_acquire (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602)
> >> [ 5644.290783] mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:486 kernel/locking/mutex.c:587)
> >> [ 5644.290783] trace_array_get (kernel/trace/trace.c:225)
> >> [ 5644.290783] tracing_open_generic_tr (kernel/trace/trace.c:3053)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_dentry_open (fs/open.c:753)
> >> [ 5644.290783] finish_open (fs/open.c:818)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_last (fs/namei.c:3040)
> >> [ 5644.290783] path_openat (fs/namei.c:3182)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_filp_open (fs/namei.c:3231)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_open_exec (fs/exec.c:766)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_execve_common.isra.19 (fs/exec.c:1491)
> >> [ 5644.290783] compat_SyS_execve (fs/exec.c:1627)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ia32_ptregs_common (arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S:495)
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] other info that might help us debug this:
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] Chain exists of:
> >> trace_types_lock --> &pipe->mutex/1 --> &sig->cred_guard_mutex
> >>
> >> [ 5644.290783] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] CPU0 CPU1
> >> [ 5644.290783] ---- ----
> >> [ 5644.290783] lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
> >> [ 5644.290783] lock(&pipe->mutex/1);
> >> [ 5644.290783] lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
> >> [ 5644.290783] lock(trace_types_lock);
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] *** DEADLOCK ***
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] 1 lock held by trinity-c17/19105:
> >> [ 5644.290783] #0: (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: prepare_bprm_creds (fs/exec.c:1165)
> >> [ 5644.290783]
> >> [ 5644.290783] stack backtrace:
> >> [ 5644.290783] CPU: 10 PID: 19105 Comm: trinity-c17 Not tainted 3.14.0-next-20140403-sasha-00019-g7474aa9-dirty #376
> >> [ 5644.290783] ffffffffb4a1a1e0 ffff88071a7738f8 ffffffffb14bfb2f 0000000000000000
> >> [ 5644.290783] ffffffffb49a9dd0 ffff88071a773948 ffffffffb14b2527 0000000000000001
> >> [ 5644.290783] ffff88071a7739d8 ffff88071a773948 ffff8805d98cbcf0 ffff8805d98cbd28
> >> [ 5644.290783] Call Trace:
> >> [ 5644.290783] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:52)
> >> [ 5644.290783] print_circular_bug (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1214)
> >> [ 5644.290783] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1840 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:809 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:160 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:191)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? preempt_count_sub (kernel/sched/core.c:2527)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? __slab_free (mm/slub.c:2598)
> >> [ 5644.290783] lock_acquire (arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? trace_array_get (kernel/trace/trace.c:225)
> >> [ 5644.290783] mutex_lock_nested (kernel/locking/mutex.c:486 kernel/locking/mutex.c:587)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? trace_array_get (kernel/trace/trace.c:225)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? locks_free_lock (fs/locks.c:244)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? trace_array_get (kernel/trace/trace.c:225)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? preempt_count_sub (kernel/sched/core.c:2527)
> >> [ 5644.290783] trace_array_get (kernel/trace/trace.c:225)
> >> [ 5644.290783] tracing_open_generic_tr (kernel/trace/trace.c:3053)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_dentry_open (fs/open.c:753)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? tracing_open_pipe (kernel/trace/trace.c:3047)
> >> [ 5644.290783] finish_open (fs/open.c:818)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_last (fs/namei.c:3040)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? link_path_walk (fs/namei.c:1473 fs/namei.c:1744)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check (lib/smp_processor_id.c:63)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2557 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2599)
> >> [ 5644.290783] path_openat (fs/namei.c:3182)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3189)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_filp_open (fs/namei.c:3231)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? put_lock_stats.isra.12 (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:98 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:254)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? do_execve_common.isra.19 (fs/exec.c:1489)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? get_parent_ip (kernel/sched/core.c:2472)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_open_exec (fs/exec.c:766)
> >> [ 5644.290783] do_execve_common.isra.19 (fs/exec.c:1491)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ? do_execve_common.isra.19 (include/linux/spinlock.h:303 fs/exec.c:1258 fs/exec.c:1486)
> >> [ 5644.290783] compat_SyS_execve (fs/exec.c:1627)
> >> [ 5644.290783] ia32_ptregs_common (arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S:495)
> >>
> >
> > Wait a minute! The syscall is a compat_SyS_execve, which does an
> > do_execve_common, which does a do_open_exec, which ends up opening a
> > tracing file????
> >
> > How the hell did that happen. Is your tool execing files in the tracing
> > directory? I wonder if that's even possible, and if so, how can we
> > prevent that? The trace_pipe file (which is what uses the
> > tracing_open_pipe) is set to rrr. No exec should be allowed.
>
> It could happen easily manually:
>
> # ls -al trace_pipe
> -r--r--r-- 1 root 0 0 Apr 8 16:43 trace_pipe
> # chmod 777 trace_pipe
> # ls -al trace_pipe
> -rwxrwxrwx 1 root 0 0 Apr 8 16:43 trace_pipe
> # ./trace_pipe
I wonder if there's a way to prevent a debugfs file from having its
permissions changed.
>
> Although when I mount everything for the fuzzer I do it with '-onoexec,nosuid'
> and the fuzzer is banned from testing mount(), so I'm not sure how it would
> do that thing on it's own.
What does the -onoexec do? Not change the exec flag of files?
Also, I wonder if this has something to do with the syscall being a
compat sys_exec and not a native one. Is userspace on your vm 32bit? Or
does the fuzzer just try the different compat calls?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists