linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] cmdline: Hide "debug" from /proc/cmdline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:26:35 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cmdline: Hide "debug" from /proc/cmdline

Hi Linus,

just checking on the status here: what did we decide on this one in
the end?

It works as expected, it is a good idea to have it as a protection
against every user space abuser, maybe we should apply it now that the
merge window is over and things are calming down?

Or should I remind you the next merge window?

Thanks.

On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:47:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > TOTALLY UNTESTED. But it really isn't complex.
> 
> Oh, and here's a patch that is actually lightly tested. I did
> 
>     while :; do echo hello; done > /dev/kmsg
> 
> (the 'yes' program buffers output, so won't work) and I get
> 
>     [  122.062912] hello
>     [  122.062915] hello
>     [  122.062918] hello
>     [  122.062921] hello
>     [  122.062924] hello
>     [  122.062927] hello
>     [  122.062930] hello
>     [  122.062932] hello
>     [  122.062935] hello
>     [  122.062938] hello
>     [  127.062671] bash: 2104439 callbacks suppressed
> 
> so it works (repeating every five seconds, as expected).
> 
> It's definitely not perfect - if we suppress output, and the process
> then closes the file descriptor rather than continuing to write more,
> you won't  get that "suppressed" message. But it's a usable starting
> point for testing and commentary on the actual limits.
> 
> So we should probably add reporting about suppressed messages at file
> close time, and we should tweak the limits (for example, perhaps not
> limit things if the buffers are largely empty - which happens at
> bootup), but on the whole I think this is a reasonable thing to do.
> 
> Whether it actually fixes the problem that Borislav had is
> questionable, of course. For all I know, systemd debug mode generates
> so much data in *other* ways and then causes feedback loops with the
> kernel debugging that this patch is totally immaterial, and dmesg was
> never the main issue. But unlike the "hide 'debug' from
> /proc/cmdline", I think this patch at least _conceptually_ makes a lot
> of sense, even if systemd gets fixed, so ...
> 
> Borislav?
> 
>                 Linus

>  kernel/printk/printk.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 4dae9cbe9259..b01ba10fb1b9 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ struct devkmsg_user {
>  	u64 seq;
>  	u32 idx;
>  	enum log_flags prev;
> +	struct ratelimit_state rs;
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	char buf[8192];
>  };
> @@ -421,11 +422,15 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_writev(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iv,
>  	int i;
>  	int level = default_message_loglevel;
>  	int facility = 1;	/* LOG_USER */
> +	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
> +	struct devkmsg_user *user = file->private_data;
>  	size_t len = iov_length(iv, count);
>  	ssize_t ret = len;
>  
> -	if (len > LOG_LINE_MAX)
> +	if (!user || len > LOG_LINE_MAX)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (!___ratelimit(&user->rs, current->comm))
> +		return ret;
>  	buf = kmalloc(len+1, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (buf == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -656,21 +661,22 @@ static unsigned int devkmsg_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>  static int devkmsg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>  	struct devkmsg_user *user;
> -	int err;
> -
> -	/* write-only does not need any file context */
> -	if ((file->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) == O_WRONLY)
> -		return 0;
>  
> -	err = check_syslog_permissions(SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_ALL,
> -				       SYSLOG_FROM_READER);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +	/* write-only does not need to check read permissions */
> +	if ((file->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) != O_WRONLY) {
> +		int err = check_syslog_permissions(SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_ALL,
> +					       SYSLOG_FROM_READER);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
>  
>  	user = kmalloc(sizeof(struct devkmsg_user), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!user)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	/* Configurable? */
> +	ratelimit_state_init(&user->rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
> +
>  	mutex_init(&user->lock);
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irq(&logbuf_lock);


-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/