lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:52:24 -0400
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>
Cc:	mhocko@...e.cz, bsingharora@...il.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: make mem_cgroup_read_stat() read all
 interested stat item in one go

Hi Jianyu,

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:11:08AM +0800, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> Currently, mem_cgroup_read_stat() is used for user interface. The
> user accounts memory usage by memory cgroup and he _always_ requires
> exact value because he accounts memory. So we don't use quick-and-fuzzy
> -read-and-do-periodic-synchronization way. Thus, we iterate all cpus
> for one read.
> 
> And we mem_cgroup_usage() and mem_cgroup_recursive_stat() both finally
> call into mem_cgroup_read_stat().
> 
> However, these *stat snapshot* operations are implemented in a quite
> coarse way: it takes M*N iteration for each stat item(M=nr_memcgs,
> N=nr_possible_cpus). There are two deficiencies:
> 
> 1. for every stat item, we have to iterate over all percpu value, which
>    is not so cache friendly.
> 2. for every stat item, we call mem_cgroup_read_stat() once, which
>    increase the probablity of contending on pcp_counter_lock.
> 
> So, this patch improve this a bit. Concretely, for all interested stat
> items, mark them in a bitmap, and then make mem_cgroup_read_stat() read
> them all in one go.
> 
> This is more efficient, and to some degree make it more like *stat snapshot*.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

This is when the user reads statistics or when OOM happens, neither of
which I would consider fast paths.  I don't think it's worth the extra
code, which looks more cumbersome than what we have.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ