| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:44:11 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
To: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
Cc: Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kishon <kishon@...com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kamil Debski <k.debski@...sung.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] phy: Add new Exynos5 USB 3.0 PHY driver
Hi Vivek,
On 15.04.2014 08:09, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com> wrote:
>>> On 09.04.2014 13:49, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Vivek,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please see my comments inline.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08.04.2014 16:36, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add a new driver for the USB 3.0 PHY on Exynos5 series of SoCs.
>>>>>> The new driver uses the generic PHY framework and will interact
>>>>>> with DWC3 controller present on Exynos5 series of SoCs.
>>>>>> Thereby, removing old phy-samsung-usb3 driver and related code
>>>>>> used untill now which was based on usb/phy framework.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt | 42 ++
>>>>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 11 +
>>>>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 668
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 4 files changed, 722 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> + Additional clock required for Exynos5420:
>>>>>> + - usb30_sclk_100m: Additional special clock used for PHY
>>>>>> operation
>>>>>> + depicted as 'sclk_usbphy30' in CMU of
>>>>>> Exynos5420.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you sure this isn't simply a gate for the ref clock, as it can be
>>>>> found
>>>>> on another SoC that is not upstream yet? I don't have documentation for
>>>>> Exynos 5420 so I can't tell, but I'd like to ask you to recheck this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> From what i can see in the manual :
>>>>
>>>> sclk_usbphy30 is derived from OSCCLK.
>>>> It is coming from a MUX (default input line to this is OSCCLK) and
>>>> then through a DIV
>>>> there's this gate.
>>>>
>>>> {OSCCLK + other sources} --->[MUX] ---> [DIV] --> [GATE for
>>>> sclk_usbphy30]
>>>>
>>>> the {rate of sclk_usbphy30} == OSCCLK
>>>>
>>>> However the 'ref' clock that we have been using is the actual oscillator
>>>> clock.
>>>> And on SoC Exynos5250, we don't have any such gate (sclk_usbphy30).
>>>> So should this mean that ref clock and sclk_usbphy30 are still be
>>>> controlled by
>>>> two different gates ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is there maybe a diagram of PHY input clocks in the datasheet, like for USB
>>> 2.0 PHY in Exynos4210/4412/5250 datasheets in the chapter about USB2.0
>>> Device? Something like:
>>>
>>> ____________________________________
>>> | |
>>> | ___________|
>>> XusbXTI | Phy_fsel[2:0] | _______ |
>>> _______[X]_______| | __________|_|___|\__|_|
>>> | | _v___ | _____ ^ | |/ | |
>>> _____ | | | | | | | | ___ | |
>>> ___ | | | | | | | | | |_|_|
>>> |___| | | X 0 |____|_| PLL |__|_|_|CLK|_|_|
>>> _____ | | | | | | |DIV|_|_|
>>> |_______[X] | |_____| 12 |_____|480 | |___| | |
>>> | MHz MHz |Digital| |
>>> XusbXTO | USB PHY |_______| |
>>> |____________________________________|
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Below is the block diagram given for DRD controller.
>>
>> ___________________
>> | |
>> | ____________ |
>> | | PHY | |
>> | | controller |-----|-----------------------------------------------
>> | |__________ | | |
>> | |
>> |
>> | USB 3.0 | V
>> | DRD |
>> -----------------------
>> | Controller | |
>> |
>> | | USB30_SCLK_100M | USB 3.0 DRD |
>> | ---------------- | ----------------------->
>> | PHY |
>> | | Link cont. | | |
>> |
>> | ------------- |
>> | |
>> |___________________| |_____________|
>>
>> Does this help ?
>>
>> So, USB30_SCLK_100M is the SCLK that we are talking in the driver. I
>> don't see any reference to XXTI in the USB 3.0 DRD controller chapter
>> (in both Exynos5250 and 5420)
>> In addition to this there's one more point to be noticed here.
>> On Exynos5420 system, the sclk_usbphy300 (which is the sclk_usbphy30
>> for USB DRD channel 0), is also the PICO phy clock, i.e. USB 2.0 phy
>> clock.
>> So we should add a similar clk_get() for this clock in the
>> phy-exynos5250-usb2 driver too, to support Exynos5420.
>
> Is something clear from the above block diagram ? (although the
> diagram looks weird - space and tabs problem :-( )
> Basically there's the clock USB30_SCLK_100M which is going into the
> USB 3.0 DRD PHY controller.
> And this is the only sclk mentioned in the block diagram for USB 3.0
> DRD controller in Exynos5420.
> Same is not there in the block diagram in Exynos5250 UM.
From what I can see in the documentation, there are 4 USB 3.0 related
clocks generated in CMU:
- sclk_usbphy300,
- sclk_usbphy301,
- sclk_usbdrd300,
- sclk_usbdrd301,
They are all rated to max. 24 MHz and the recommended operating
frequency is 24 MHz, so it looks exactly like USB PHY reference, which
is usually a 24 MHz clock.
To me, this looks like on Exynos5420 a separate special clock path is
used instead of xusbxti as reference of USB 3.0 PHY and so the sclk
should be simply passed as the "ref" clock.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists