lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:08:13 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: comment in x86-opcode-map.txt on CALLW discrepancy
 between Intel and AMD

(2014/04/18 22:34), Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> In 64-bit mode, AMD and Intel CPUs treat 0x66 prefix before branch
> insns differently. For near branches, it affects decode too since
> immediate offset's width is different.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>

Thank you!

> CC: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> index 1a2be7c..816488c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> @@ -273,6 +273,9 @@ dd: ESC
>  de: ESC
>  df: ESC
>  # 0xe0 - 0xef
> +# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior: they ignore 0x66 prefix
> +# in 64-bit mode. AMD CPUs accept 0x66 prefix, it causes RIP truncation
> +# to 16 bits. In 32-bit mode, 0x66 is accepted by both Intel and AMD.
>  e0: LOOPNE/LOOPNZ Jb (f64)
>  e1: LOOPE/LOOPZ Jb (f64)
>  e2: LOOP Jb (f64)
> @@ -281,6 +284,10 @@ e4: IN AL,Ib
>  e5: IN eAX,Ib
>  e6: OUT Ib,AL
>  e7: OUT Ib,eAX
> +# With 0x66 prefix in 64-bit mode, for AMD CPUs immediate offset
> +# in "near" jumps and calls is 16-bit. For CALL,
> +# push of return address is 16-bit wide, RSP is decremented by 2
> +# but is not truncated to 16 bits, unlike RIP.
>  e8: CALL Jz (f64)
>  e9: JMP-near Jz (f64)
>  ea: JMP-far Ap (i64)
> @@ -456,6 +463,7 @@ AVXcode: 1
>  7e: movd/q Ey,Pd | vmovd/q Ey,Vy (66),(v1) | vmovq Vq,Wq (F3),(v1)
>  7f: movq Qq,Pq | vmovdqa Wx,Vx (66) | vmovdqu Wx,Vx (F3)
>  # 0x0f 0x80-0x8f
> +# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior (see comment about CALL insn).
>  80: JO Jz (f64)
>  81: JNO Jz (f64)
>  82: JB/JC/JNAE Jz (f64)
> @@ -842,6 +850,7 @@ EndTable
>  GrpTable: Grp5
>  0: INC Ev
>  1: DEC Ev
> +# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior (see comment about CALL insn).
>  2: CALLN Ev (f64)
>  3: CALLF Ep
>  4: JMPN Ev (f64)
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ