lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:26:06 -0500
From:	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
To:	Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] soc: qcom: Add GSBI driver

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:11:18PM -0500, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:54:00AM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > > +	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,mode", &mode)) {
> > > +		dev_err(gsbi->dev, "missing mode configuration\n");
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > I'm wondering if you should really be a (very simple) pinctrl driver
> > proper.
> 
> Perhaps.  But how would i reconcile more than one device node that uses the same
> GSBI?  One could still trounce the other unless I only allow one setting of the
> GSBI.
> 

I don't understand, as long as the pins/functions have been specified
properly to the pinctrl core, I would expect a conflicting configuration
to be rejected.

Anyway, I wouldn't expect the subnodes to be consuming the GSBI pin
configuration anyway (although that could probably be done), instead, I
would expect the GSBI node to consume it's own pin configuration.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ