linux-kernel - Re: ftrace/kprobes: Warning when insmod two modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:29:45 +0900
From:	Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>
To:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
CC:	fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com, ananth@...ibm.com,
	anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ftrace/kprobes: Warning when insmod two modules

(2014/04/22 12:51), Rusty Russell wrote:
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:26:05 +0900
>> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Thank you for reporting with this pretty backtrace :)
>>> Steven, I think this is not the kprobe bug but ftrace (and perhaps, module).
>>
>> Looks to be more of a module issue than a ftrace issue.
>>
>>>
>>> If the ftrace can set loading module text read only before the module subsystem
>>> expected, I think it should be protected by the module subsystem itself
>>> (e.g. set_all_modules_text_ro(rw) skips the modules which is MODULE_STATE_COMING)
>>>
>>
>> Does this patch fix it?
>>
>> In-review-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> Sorry, was on paternity leave.
> 
> I'm always nervous about adding more states, since every place which
> examines the state has to be audited.
> 
> We set the mod->state to MOD_STATE_COMING in complete_formation;
> why don't we set NX there instead?  It also makes more sense to
> set NX before we hit parse_args() which can execute code in the module.
> 
> In fact, we should probably call the notifier there too, so people
> can breakpoint/tracepoint/etc parameter calls.
> 
> Of course, this means that we set NX before the notifier; does anything
> break?

This does not work. ftrace_process_locs() is called from the notifier,
and it tries to change its text like this.

load_module
  blocking_notifier_call_chain
    ftrace_module_notify_enter
      ftrace_init_module
        ftrace_process_locs
          sort
            ftrace_swap_ips

But the text is already RO, so it causes panic. We need to call notifier
before setting it RO. Or should we unset RO temporarily in
ftrace_process_locs()?

Thanks,
Takao Indoh


> 
> Subject: module: set nx before marking module MODULE_STATE_COMING.
> 
> This prevents a WARN_ON() where ftrace calls set_all_modules_text_ro()
> which races with the module setting its own set_section_ro_nx().
> 
> It also means we're NX protected before we call parse_args(), which
> can execute module code.
> 
> This means that the notifiers will be called on a module which
> is already NX, so that may cause problems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index 11869408f79b..83a437e5d429 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3023,21 +3023,6 @@ static int do_init_module(struct module *mod)
>   	 */
>   	current->flags &= ~PF_USED_ASYNC;
>   
> -	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list,
> -			MODULE_STATE_COMING, mod);
> -
> -	/* Set RO and NX regions for core */
> -	set_section_ro_nx(mod->module_core,
> -				mod->core_text_size,
> -				mod->core_ro_size,
> -				mod->core_size);
> -
> -	/* Set RO and NX regions for init */
> -	set_section_ro_nx(mod->module_init,
> -				mod->init_text_size,
> -				mod->init_ro_size,
> -				mod->init_size);
> -
>   	do_mod_ctors(mod);
>   	/* Start the module */
>   	if (mod->init != NULL)
> @@ -3168,9 +3153,26 @@ static int complete_formation(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
>   	/* This relies on module_mutex for list integrity. */
>   	module_bug_finalize(info->hdr, info->sechdrs, mod);
>   
> +	/* Set RO and NX regions for core */
> +	set_section_ro_nx(mod->module_core,
> +				mod->core_text_size,
> +				mod->core_ro_size,
> +				mod->core_size);
> +
> +	/* Set RO and NX regions for init */
> +	set_section_ro_nx(mod->module_init,
> +				mod->init_text_size,
> +				mod->init_ro_size,
> +				mod->init_size);
> +
>   	/* Mark state as coming so strong_try_module_get() ignores us,
>   	 * but kallsyms etc. can see us. */
>   	mod->state = MODULE_STATE_COMING;
> +	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> +
> +	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list,
> +				     MODULE_STATE_COMING, mod);
> +	return 0;
>   
>   out:
>   	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/