linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] Use lock_device_hotplug() in cpu_probe_store() and cpu_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:00:26 +0800
From:	Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, toshi.kani@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] Use lock_device_hotplug() in
 cpu_probe_store() and cpu_release_store()

On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 16:40 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:29:37AM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> > The probe/release files are attribute files for cpu subsys, looks like
> > following in sysfs dirs
> > 
> > $ cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/
> > $ ls -l
> > total 0
> > drwxr-xr-x. 7 root root     0 Apr 17 19:00 cpu0
> > drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root     0 Apr 17 19:00 cpu1
> > drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root     0 Apr 17 19:00 cpu10
> > ......
> > drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root     0 Apr 20 08:00 cpufreq
> > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root     0 Apr 20 08:00 cpuidle
> > -rw-------. 1 root root 65536 Apr 21 00:28 dscr_default
> > -r--r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Apr 21 00:28 kernel_max
> > -r--r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Apr 21 00:28 offline
> > -r--r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Sep  4  2014 online
> > -r--r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Apr 21 00:28 possible
> > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root     0 Apr 20 08:00 power
> > -r--r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Apr 17 20:46 present
> > --w-------. 1 root root 65536 Apr 21 00:28 probe        <-----	
> > --w-------. 1 root root 65536 Apr 21 00:28 release      <-----
> > -rw-------. 1 root root 65536 Apr 21 00:28 subcores_per_core
> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 65536 Apr 21 00:28 uevent
> > 
> > From the code, it seems cpu subsys won't be unregistered, and it doesn't
> > make sense to remove all the cpus in the system. 
> 
> I don't think I'm following you.  Are you saying that no files which
> are protected under the hotplug lock that cpu subsys uses are removed
> during offlining?

Sorry, Maybe I didn't say it clearly. 

There are files under cpu#, e.g. 

$ cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0
$ ls
cache             dscr   node1        pmc1  pmc5   smt_snooze_delay
uevent
cpuidle           mmcr0  online       pmc2  pmc6   spurr
crash_notes       mmcr1  physical_id  pmc3  power  subsystem
crash_notes_size  mmcra  pir          pmc4  purr   topology

If you remove cpu0, then the cpu0 directory will be removed, together
with the "online" file in the directory, while some other process might
be writing 0 or 1 to it.

But here, for the probe/release, take "release" for example, if user
writes something that stands for cpu0 to it, the cpu0 will be removed, 
and the cpu0 directory and the files under it will be removed. But
"release" itself is not removed.

They are attributes of cpu_subsys, not of some specific cpus.

Hopes the above makes things a bit clearer. 

Thanks, Zhong

> 
> Thanks.
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/