linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 06/12] ACPI: introduce platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:51:24 +0800
From:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, matthew.garrett@...ula.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 06/12] ACPI: introduce platform_id flag

On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 00:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 12:06:53 AM Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Only certain kind of ACPI device objects can be enumerated to platform bus.
> > These ACPI device objects include
> > 1. ACPI device objects that have _HID control method.
> > 2. some ACPI device objects that have Linux specified HID strings.
> > 
> > In order to distinguish those device objects from the others, a new flag
> > platform_id and a new function acpi_add_platform_id() are introduced
> > in this patch.
> > 
> > Currently, only devices with _HID method have this flag set.
> > If you want platform devices to be created for device objects without _HID,
> > use acpi_add_platform_id() when adding artificial Linux-specific ID strings
> > to them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> 
> It looks like [12/12] should be folded into this one or bisection may be broken
> for somebody.
> 
agreed.

thanks,
rui
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c     |    9 ++++++++-
> >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |    3 ++-
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index c82ab73..451e7d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -1730,6 +1730,13 @@ static void acpi_add_id(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp, const char *dev_id)
> >  	pnp->type.hardware_id = 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void acpi_add_platform_id(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
> > +				 const char *dev_id)
> > +{
> > +	acpi_add_id(pnp, dev_id);
> > +	pnp->type.platform_id = 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Old IBM workstations have a DSDT bug wherein the SMBus object
> >   * lacks the SMBUS01 HID and the methods do not have the necessary "_"
> > @@ -1794,7 +1801,7 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_HID)
> > -			acpi_add_id(pnp, info->hardware_id.string);
> > +			acpi_add_platform_id(pnp, info->hardware_id.string);
> >  		if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_CID) {
> >  			cid_list = &info->compatible_id_list;
> >  			for (i = 0; i < cid_list->count; i++)
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index ba679af..ec92ad3 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -233,7 +233,8 @@ struct acpi_hardware_id {
> >  struct acpi_pnp_type {
> >  	u32 hardware_id:1;
> >  	u32 bus_address:1;
> > -	u32 reserved:30;
> > +	u32 platform_id:1;
> > +	u32 reserved:29;
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct acpi_device_pnp {
> > 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/