linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86-64: espfix for 64-bit mode *PROTOTYPE*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:20:51 -0700
From:	Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, comex <comexk@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...ehq.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: espfix for 64-bit mode *PROTOTYPE*

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:08 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 04/28/2014 04:05 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>
>>> So I tried writing this bit up, but it fails in some rather spectacular
>>> ways.  Furthermore, I have been unable to debug it under Qemu, because
>>> breakpoints don't work right (common Qemu problem, sadly.)
>>>
>>> The kernel code is at:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/hpa/espfix64.git/
>>>
>>> There are two tests:
>>>
>>> git://git.zytor.com/users/hpa/test16/test16.git, build it, and run
>>> ./run16 test/hello.elf
>>> http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ldttest.c
>>>
>>> The former will exercise the irq_return_ldt path, but not the fault
>>> path; the latter will exercise the fault path, but doesn't actually use
>>> a 16-bit segment.
>>>
>>> Under the 3.14 stock kernel, the former should die with SIGBUS and the
>>> latter should pass.
>>>
>>
>> Current status of the above code: if I remove the randomization in
>> espfix_64.c then the first test passes; the second generally crashes the
>> machine.  With the randomization there, both generally crash the machine.
>>
>> All my testing so far has been under KVM or Qemu, so there is always the
>> possibility that I'm chasing a KVM/Qemu bug, but I suspect it is
>> something simpler than that.
>
> I'm compiling your branch.  In the mean time, two possibly stupid questions:
>
> What's the assembly code in the double-fault entry for?
>
> Have you tried hbreak in qemu?  I've had better luck with hbreak than
> regular break in the past.
>

ldttest segfaults on 3.13 and 3.14 for me.  It reboots (triple fault?)
on your branch.  It even said this:

qemu-system-x86_64: 9pfs:virtfs_reset: One or more uncluncked fids
found during reset

I have no idea what an uncluncked fd is :)

hello.elf fails to sigbus.  weird.  gdb says:

1: x/i $pc
=> 0xffffffff8170559c <irq_return_ldt+90>:
    jmp    0xffffffff81705537 <irq_return_iret>
(gdb) si
<signal handler called>
1: x/i $pc
=> 0xffffffff81705537 <irq_return_iret>:    iretq
(gdb) si
Cannot access memory at address 0xf0000000f
(gdb) info registers
rax            0xffe4000f00001000    -7881234923384832
rbx            0x1000000010    68719476752
rcx            0xffe4f5580000f000    -7611541041909760
rdx            0x805d000    134598656
rsi            0x102170000ffe3    283772784279523
rdi            0xf00000007    64424509447
rbp            0xf0000000f    0xf0000000f
rsp            0xf0000000f    0xf0000000f
r8             0x0    0
r9             0x0    0
r10            0x0    0
r11            0x0    0
r12            0x0    0
r13            0x0    0
r14            0x0    0
r15            0x0    0
rip            0x0    0x0 <irq_stack_union>
eflags         0x0    [ ]
cs             0x0    0
ss             0x37f    895
ds             0x0    0
es             0x0    0
fs             0x0    0
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
gs             0x0    0

I got this with 'hbreak irq_return_ldt' using 'target remote :1234'
and virtme-run --console --kimg
~/apps/linux-devel/arch/x86/boot/bzImage --qemu-opts -s

This set of registers looks thoroughly bogus.  I don't trust it.  I'm
now stuck -- single-stepping stays exactly where it started.
Something is rather screwed up here.  Telling gdb to continue causes
gdb to explode and 'Hello, Afterworld!' to be displayed.

I was not able to get a breakpoint on __do_double_fault to hit.

FWIW, I think that gdb is known to have issues debugging a guest that
switches bitness.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/