lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:34:01 +0200
From:	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] perf, mmap: Factor out perf_get_fd()

On 25.04.14 16:52:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But no, I don't think that helps, its still true that the moment you get
> a fd another thread can immediately close(). That would drop the last
> ref and free it, meanwhile perf_event_open() is happily poking at it.
> 
> Now I think you could cure this by adding an extra ref before calling
> your perf_get_fd() and dropping that extra ref at the end, where we used
> to have fd_install().

Yes, right. I have a solution now which increments the event's ref
count before creating the file descriptor using try_get_event()/
put_event().

The patch also does not remove get_unused_fd_flags() and the err_fd
error handler.

Have an update already of a rebase version but still need to test it.

Would it be ok to split the patch set and send in a first step only
the first 4 patches that refactor the perf mmap code?

Thanks,

-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ