linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: defconfigs: add MTD_SPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:06:03 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: defconfigs: add MTD_SPI_NOR (new dependency for
 M25P80)

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:39:37AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 01:21 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > These defconfigs contain the CONFIG_M25P80 symbol, which is now
> > dependent on the MTD_SPI_NOR symbol. Add CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NOR to the
> > relevant defconfigs.
> > 
> > At the same time, drop the now-nonexistent CONFIG_MTD_CHAR symbol.
> 
> I hadn't realized that the problem this patch solves was already present
> in the code, so this patch is simply catching up the defconfigs rather
> than part of a series which changed the code to cause the problem.

Yes, this is "catching up the defconfigs." The SPI_NOR framework is new,
and I didn't want to generate defconfig noise until a few things
stabilized (particularly, its Kconfig symbol name).

> So, this needs to be applied ASAP.
> 
> I think this should be split it up so that each defconfig can go through
> the tree that owns it to avoid conflicts. If you repost split up, I can
> apply the tegra_defconfig change to the Tegra tree.

OK, I'll try to split it up. Is ARM unique in tracking defconfigs in
separate trees? I assume MIPS, PowerPC, and Blackfin won't require the
same splitting? I'd like to avoid 31 patches when <20 could suffice.

I'll also rebase on linux-next. I think there may be a few conflicts.

Thanks,
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/