linux-kernel - Re: [3.15-rc3] rtmutex-debug assertion.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:13:57 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
	davidlohr@...com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [3.15-rc3] rtmutex-debug assertion.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Dave Jones wrote:
> This is trickier to reproduce than it first seemed, as logging slows
> things down so much.  But after a few hours, it logged that the
> call that triggered this was..
> 
> futex(uaddr=0x7f55ff8c4000, op=0x6, val=0x200000006223800b, utime=0x7f55ff8c4000, uaddr2=0x7f55ff8c4000, val3=-123)
> 
> Those addresses come from an mmap we made on startup..
> 
> [init] mapping[3]: (zeropage PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE) 0x7f55ff8c4000 (1MB)
> 
> op = FUTEX_LOCK_PI
> 
> val seems to be garbage.
> 
> I'll do another run, just to see if it's always the same set of values,
> but it's going to probably take an overnight run.

Do you have the full fuzzing log, so I can see what happened
before/around that?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/