linux-kernel - Re: dcache shrink list corruption?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 May 2014 00:38:06 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dcache shrink list corruption?

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:04:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > I've just pushed the whole thing to vfs.git#for-linus;
> > review and testing would be very welcome.
> 
> I have no half-way relevant test-case for this, so I'm hoping people
> who have good VFS stress-tests (preferably under memory pressure so
> that we get that whole shrinking path) will test.
> 
> But it looks fine.
> 
> That said, I do hate that RCU read-lock around the final spin-unlock.

So do I, obviously...  After looking through the rest of arch_spin_unlock(),
it looks like the only suspicious one except the paravirt on x86 is
blackfin.  And that might be misreading - I'm not familiar enough with the
architecture to tell...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/