linux-kernel - Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 May 2014 19:27:31 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:43:17PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > In principle the vfs file refcounting should be responsible for that.
> > But I'll go over it in a bit.
> 
> The poll code is ancient and the C-parser in my head really can't handle 
> it very well.

Yeah, that code isn't my favourite part either..

> Anyway for completeness this is the kind of thing I'm seeing.
> The poll() manpage isn't very clear about what is supposed to happen if 
> you poll() on a closed file descriptor.

              POLLNVAL
                     Invalid request: fd not open (output only).

Seems applicable..


Also, could you send your entire diff this way so we're more or less
staring at the same code again?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped