linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 May 2014 21:08:02 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
To:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/locks.c: replace seq_printf by seq_puts

On Sat, 3 May 2014 22:28:43 +0200
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be> wrote:

> Replace seq_printf where possible
> 
> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
> ---
>  fs/locks.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index e663aea..78ac209 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -2411,31 +2411,31 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
>  	seq_printf(f, "%lld:%s ", id, pfx);
>  	if (IS_POSIX(fl)) {
>  		if (fl->fl_flags & FL_ACCESS)
> -			seq_printf(f, "ACCESS");
> +			seq_puts(f, "ACCESS");
>  		else if (IS_OFDLCK(fl))
> -			seq_printf(f, "OFDLCK");
> +			seq_puts(f, "OFDLCK");
>  		else
> -			seq_printf(f, "POSIX ");
> +			seq_puts(f, "POSIX ");
>  
>  		seq_printf(f, " %s ",
>  			     (inode == NULL) ? "*NOINODE*" :
>  			     mandatory_lock(inode) ? "MANDATORY" : "ADVISORY ");
>  	} else if (IS_FLOCK(fl)) {
>  		if (fl->fl_type & LOCK_MAND) {
> -			seq_printf(f, "FLOCK  MSNFS     ");
> +			seq_puts(f, "FLOCK  MSNFS     ");
>  		} else {
> -			seq_printf(f, "FLOCK  ADVISORY  ");
> +			seq_puts(f, "FLOCK  ADVISORY  ");
>  		}
>  	} else if (IS_LEASE(fl)) {
> -		seq_printf(f, "LEASE  ");
> +		seq_puts(f, "LEASE  ");
>  		if (lease_breaking(fl))
> -			seq_printf(f, "BREAKING  ");
> +			seq_puts(f, "BREAKING  ");
>  		else if (fl->fl_file)
> -			seq_printf(f, "ACTIVE    ");
> +			seq_puts(f, "ACTIVE    ");
>  		else
> -			seq_printf(f, "BREAKER   ");
> +			seq_puts(f, "BREAKER   ");
>  	} else {
> -		seq_printf(f, "UNKNOWN UNKNOWN  ");
> +		seq_puts(f, "UNKNOWN UNKNOWN  ");
>  	}
>  	if (fl->fl_type & LOCK_MAND) {
>  		seq_printf(f, "%s ",
> @@ -2467,7 +2467,7 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
>  		else
>  			seq_printf(f, "%Ld %Ld\n", fl->fl_start, fl->fl_end);
>  	} else {
> -		seq_printf(f, "0 EOF\n");
> +		seq_puts(f, "0 EOF\n");
>  	}
>  }
>  

Looks good to me. I'll plan to merge it for v3.16.

Thanks!
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/