linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging/lustre: Replace jobid acquiring with per node setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 May 2014 23:08:36 -0400
From:	Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/lustre: Replace jobid acquiring with per node setting

Hello!

On May 3, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> I don't think I saw complaints about proc files, the complaints I saw were mostly about
>> reading env variables directly and the like so that was the focus of this patch.
>> Did I miss some side discussion? Any pointers?
> No, no side discussion, the proc files need to be removed / fixed before
> the code can be merged to the "proper" part of the kernel tree.

So, what's broken about them then?
It's not like there are no files in proc or that lustre-proc files are causing some
sort of breakage (at least not anymore after that recent patch).

So some guidance would be really appreciated.

Bye,
    Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/