[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 14:47:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Cute.. does the below cure?
>
>
> ---
> Subject: perf: Fix perf_event_init_context()
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Mon May 5 19:12:20 CEST 2014
>
> perf_pin_task_context() can return NULL but perf_event_init_context()
> assumes it will not, correct this.
It makes the oops go away, but it does make the fuzzer become unkillable
while using 100% CPU.
It looks like it is stuck repeating this forever:
perf_fuzzer-5256 [000] 275.943049: kmalloc: (T.1262+0xe) call_site=ffffffff810d022f ptr=0xffff8800cb028400 bytes_req=216 bytes_alloc=256 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO
perf_fuzzer-5256 [000] 275.943057: function: perf_lock_task_context
perf_fuzzer-5256 [000] 275.943057: function: alloc_perf_context
and memory is slowly leaking away.
Meanwhile the haswell and AMD machines have been fuzzing away without
issue, I don't know why the core2 machine is always the trouble maker.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists