linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] watchdog: Add API to trigger reboots

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 May 2014 12:45:45 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] watchdog: Add API to trigger reboots

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
> > for example by triggering a watchdog timeout. Platform specific
> > code starts to spread into watchdog drivers, typically by setting
> > pointers to a callback functions which is then called from the
> > platform reset handler.
> > 
> > To simplify code and provide a unified API to trigger reboots by
> > watchdog drivers, provide a single API to trigger such reboots
> > through the watchdog subsystem.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > ---
> >  drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c |   17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/watchdog.h         |   11 +++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> > index cec9b55..4ec6e2f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_core.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,17 @@
> >  static DEFINE_IDA(watchdog_ida);
> >  static struct class *watchdog_class;
> >  
> > +static struct watchdog_device *wdd_reboot_dev;
> > +
> > +void watchdog_do_reboot(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
> > +{
> > +	if (wdd_reboot_dev) {
> > +		if (wdd_reboot_dev->ops->reboot)
> 
> you can decrease one level of indentation:
> 
> 	if (wdd_reboot_dev && wdd_reboot_dev->ops->reboot)
> 
> also, shouldn't you test if 'ops' is valid too ? In that case:
> 
> 	if (wdd_reboot_dev && wdd_reboot_dev->ops &&
> 		wdd_reboot_dev->ops->reboot)
> 
Hmmm ... makes me think.

If ops->reboot is not set, wdd_reboot_dev should be NULL
to start with, since it is only initialized if ops->reboot
is not NULL.

It is not common in the Linux kernel to re-check pointers
if the condition can not occur, so I don't think it should
be done here.

In other words, I should probably remove the ops check as well.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/