linux-kernel - Re: X86: Impossible select Enhanced Real Time Clock Support (legacy PC RTC driver)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 May 2014 00:34:41 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
cc:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: X86: Impossible select Enhanced Real Time Clock Support (legacy
 PC RTC driver)

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Alessandro Zummo wrote:

> > But it sounds like the driver/char/rtc bit is dead code, and needs a
> > cleanup? Or is there some use of that code that you need that the
> > generic RTC layer doesn't have?
> 
>  as far as I know, no recent distribution is using the old code anymore 
>  and the new (well, not so new anymore) framework provides the same 
>  functionality.

 Well, the handling of update-ended interrupts is still missing, as is 
some non-x86 stuff I posted a fix for recently (still pending review, can 
you please look into it sometime?).

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/