[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 09:17:23 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] regulator: Add LTC3589 support
Am Donnerstag, den 01.05.2014, 11:07 -0700 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:37:10PM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > This patch adds support for the Linear Technology LTC3589, LTC3589-1,
> > and LTC3589-2 8-output I2C voltage regulator ICs.
>
> One small nit in addition to the vendor prefix thing:
>
> > +static const int ltc3589_12_ldo4[] = {
> > + 1200000, 1800000, 2500000, 3200000,
> > +};
>
> This could use regulator_map_voltage_ascend(), though for all practical
> purposes the table is so small it makes no meaningful difference.
The table for the LTC3589-without-1/2 variant is not ascending.
If it makes no difference, I'd prefer to use the same ops for both.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists