linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] slab: move up code to get kmem_cache_node in free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 May 2014 14:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
cc:	cl@...ux.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] slab: move up code to get kmem_cache_node in
 free_block()

On Wed, 7 May 2014, George Spelvin wrote:

> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 388cb1ae6f..7fdc8df104 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -215,9 +215,9 @@ static inline void set_obj_pfmemalloc(void **objp)
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void clear_obj_pfmemalloc(void **objp)
> +static inline void *clear_obj_pfmemalloc(void **objp)
>  {
> -	*objp = (void *)((unsigned long)*objp & ~SLAB_OBJ_PFMEMALLOC);
> +	return *objp = (void *)((unsigned long)*objp & ~SLAB_OBJ_PFMEMALLOC);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -809,10 +809,8 @@ static void *__ac_get_obj(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct array_cache *ac,
>  	if (unlikely(is_obj_pfmemalloc(objp))) {
>  		struct kmem_cache_node *n;
>  
> -		if (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(flags)) {
> -			clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp);
> -			return objp;
> -		}
> +		if (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(flags))
> +			return clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp);
>  
>  		/* The caller cannot use PFMEMALLOC objects, find another one */
>  		for (i = 0; i < ac->avail; i++) {
> @@ -833,9 +831,8 @@ static void *__ac_get_obj(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct array_cache *ac,
>  		if (!list_empty(&n->slabs_free) && force_refill) {
>  			struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(objp);
>  			ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(page);
> -			clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp);
>  			recheck_pfmemalloc_active(cachep, ac);
> -			return objp;
> +			return clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp);
>  		}
>  
>  		/* No !PFMEMALLOC objects available */
> @@ -3362,17 +3359,12 @@ static void free_block(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void **objpp, int nr_objects,
>  		       int node)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -	struct kmem_cache_node *n;
> +	struct kmem_cache_node *n = cachep->node[node];
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_objects; i++) {
> -		void *objp;
> -		struct page *page;
> -
> -		clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objpp[i]);
> -		objp = objpp[i];
> +		void *objp = clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objpp[i]);
> +		struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(objp);
>  
> -		page = virt_to_head_page(objp);
> -		n = cachep->node[node];
>  		list_del(&page->lru);
>  		check_spinlock_acquired_node(cachep, node);
>  		slab_put_obj(cachep, page, objp, node);

I think this unnecessarily obfuscates the code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/