linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] remap_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri,  9 May 2014 17:05:36 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Armin Rigo <arigo@...es.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] remap_file_pages() decommission

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> i.e. if you remove or
> >> emulate remap_file_pages(), please increase the default limit as well.
> >
> > It's fine to me. Andrew?
> 
> Not Andrew, but one thing we might look at is to make the limit
> per-user rather than per-vm.

Hm. I'm confused here. Do we have any limit forced per-user?
I only see things like rlimits which are copied from parrent.
Is it what you want?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/