linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 7/7] ARM: dts: Add device tree sources for Exynos3250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 09 May 2014 07:02:45 +0200
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
CC:	kgene.kim@...sung.com, t.figa@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	ben-linux@...ff.org, arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net,
	marc.zyngier@....com, thomas.abraham@...aro.org,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, inki.dae@...sung.com,
	sw0312.kim@...sung.com, hyunhee.kim@...sung.com,
	yj44.cho@...sung.com, chanho61.park@...sung.com,
	sajjan.linux@...il.com, tushar.behera@...aro.org,
	sachin.kamat@...aro.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 7/7] ARM: dts: Add device tree sources for Exynos3250

Hi Chanwoo,

On 09.05.2014 03:06, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 04/26/2014 09:51 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On 25.04.2014 03:16, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

[snip]

>>> +    cpus {
>>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +        #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> +        cpu@0 {
>>> +            device_type = "cpu";
>>> +            compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
>>> +            reg = <0>;
>>> +            clock-frequency = <1000000000>;
>>> +        };
>>
>> Why only one CPU? I believe Exynos3250 is dual core.
>
> I'll add cpu1 information.
>
>> Also are physical IDs of the cores really 0 and 1? On Exynos4210 for example they are 0x900 and 0x901, while on Exynos4212 they are 0xa00 and 0xa01. Please check this.
>
> The 'reg' property means only hardware id(hwid) of CPU.
> You can check it on arm_dt_init_cpu_maps() in arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c.h.
> or Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt.
>

Well, as described in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt, on 
32-bit ARM v7 or later CPUs the "reg" property should be equal to the 
lower 24-bits of MPIDR value of given CPU, which in addition to core ID 
includes also cluster ID, which can be non-zero, even on single cluster 
SoCs (like it is on Exynos4210 and 4x12).

>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +    fixed-rate-clocks {
>>> +        compatible = "simple-bus";
>>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
>>> +        #size-cells = <0>;

[snip]

>>> +    cmu: clock-controller@...30000 {
>>> +        compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-cmu";
>>> +        reg = <0x10030000 0x20000>;
>>> +        #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +    rtc@...70000 {
>>
>> Please add label to the node, so it can be referenced from board dts files added later (using the method I explained above).
>
> OK, I'll add lable as following:
>
> 	rtc_0: rtc@...70000 {

There is no need to suffix the RTC with _0, as there is just one RTC in 
the SoC. So in this case rtc: rtc@...70000 will be enough.

>
>>
>>> +        compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc";
>>> +        reg = <0x10070000 0x100>;
>>> +        interrupts = <0 73 0>, <0 74 0>;
>>> +        status = "disabled";
>>> +    };

[snip]

>>> +    adc: adc@...C0000 {
>>> +        compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v3";
>>> +        reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>;
>>> +        interrupts = <0 137 0>;
>>> +        clock-names = "adc", "sclk_tsadc";
>>> +        clocks = <&cmu CLK_TSADC>, <&cmu CLK_SCLK_TSADC>;
>>> +        #io-channel-cells = <1>;
>>> +        io-channel-ranges;
>>> +        status = "disabled";
>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +    serial@...00000 {
>>
>> Please add label.
>
> OK, I'll add lable as following:
>
> 	serial_0: serial@...00000 {
>

OK. In this case there are multiple instances of serial controller 
available so the _0 suffix is fine.

>>
>>> +        compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart";
>>> +        reg = <0x13800000 0x100>;
>>> +        interrupts = <0 109 0>;
>>> +        clocks = <&cmu CLK_UART0>, <&cmu CLK_SCLK_UART0>;
>>> +        clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
>>> +        status = "disabled";
>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +    serial@...10000 {
>
> OK, I'll add lable as following:
>
> 	serial_1: serial@...00000 {
>

OK.

>
> Thanks for your review.

You're welcome. Thanks for addressing my comments.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/