linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] input: Introduce ff-memless-next as an improved replacement for ff-memless

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 May 2014 11:14:42 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Michal Malý <madcatxster@...oid-pointer.net>
cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, elias.vds@...il.com,
	anssi.hannula@....fi, simon@...gewell.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] input: Introduce ff-memless-next as an improved
 replacement for ff-memless

On Sat, 26 Apr 2014, Michal Malý wrote:

> ff-memless-next (MLNX) is a largely improved version of the current ff-memless
> (FFML) driver. MLNX supports all force feedback effects currently available in
> the Linux force feedback userspace API. All effects are handled in accordance
> with Microsoft's DirectInput/XInput. Most notable changes include support for
> conditional effects, proper handling of all periodic waveforms and improved
> emulation of rumble effects through periodic effects. MLNX also uses its own
> kernel API to pass processed effects to hardware-specific drivers instead of
> abusing "ff_effect" struct. The API is documented in the respective header
> file.
> 
> MLNX has been expanded to be a direct replacement for FFML.
> 
> Support for FF_PERIODIC and FF_RAMP has been added to all devices that
> support FF_CONSTANT as a part of the port to the new API.
> 
> This patch series:
> 1) Adds "ff-memless-next" module [1]
> 2) Ports all hardware-specific drivers to MLNX's API [2-23]
> 3) Removes FFML and replaces it with MLNX [24]

Dmitry,

what are your plans with this, please?

I personally don't really completely like having two implementations of FF 
in the kernel; can't it be really done as an extension to ff-memless?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/