lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 May 2014 15:01:20 +0200
From:	Tomas Henzl <thenzl@...hat.com>
To:	ching <ching2048@...ca.com.tw>
CC:	jbottomley@...allels.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
	agordeev@...hat.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1 2/16 update 3] arcmsr:  Adding code to support MSI-X
 interrupt

On 05/12/2014 01:55 PM, ching wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> Thanks for your remind again.
> The patch 17/17 will be as following.

Hi Ching,
I think we have messed up this thread a bit. Please repost the 2/16 with fixes related only to msi-x,
this is the original 2/26 patch update with fixes directly related to it - free_irq + related fixes to error path.
This should create a clear situation so James knows what he should take

For the other changes - moving scsi_scan_host + flush_work etc. either create a 17/16 patch
or  wait until the 16/16 set is taken and then post a new patch.

 out_free_sysfs:
-scsi_host_remove:
-	scsi_remove_host(host);
-RAID_controller_stop:
+	del_timer_sync(&acb->eternal_timer);
+	flush_scheduled_work();

Btw, isn't flush_work(&acb->arcmsr_d..  better here?
and if so the block looks almost identical to what is in arcmsr_shutdown,
can we use it instead?

Thanks,
Tomas

>  	arcmsr_stop_adapter_bgrb(acb);
>  	arcmsr_flush_adapter_cache(acb);
> +	arcmsr_free_irq(pdev, acb);
> +scsi_host_remove:
> +	scsi_remove_host(host);
> +free_ccb_pool:
>  	arcmsr_free_ccb_pool(acb);
>  free_hbb_mu:
>  	arcmsr_free_mu(acb);
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 13:15 +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> On 05/08/2014 01:37 PM, ching wrote:
>>> Hi Tomas,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your suggestion.
>>> I will add a new patch 17/17 at last.
>> This additional patch was meant for moving the scsi_scan_host, because it's
>> nor related to the ms-x interrupts. Probably  the maintainer will prefer
>> a single patch which changes msi-x at once, I don't care.
>> To the patch below - you should also free the allocated irqs as I wrote previously.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tomas
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ