linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clean up DMA API docs and dma_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 May 2014 17:56:01 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clean up DMA API docs and dma_addr_t usage

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:50:22AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/14/2014 03:23 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:48:47PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Maybe the third time's a charm :)
> >>
> >> This cleans up some DMA-API documentation and makes a minor no-op change to
> >> the dma_declare_coherent_memory() prototype.
> >>
> >> Changes from v2:
> >>   - Added description of CPU virtual/physical and bus addresses in
> >>     DMA-API-HOWTO
> >>   - Added comments to sh/PCI (Dreamcast) update
> >>   - Dropped IOMMU interface dma_addr_t changes
> >>
> >> I didn't add Arnd's and Greg's acks to patch 1 because of all the new
> >> address description text I added.
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Bjorn Helgaas (4):
> >>       DMA-API: Clarify physical/bus address distinction
> >>       DMA-API: Change dma_declare_coherent_memory() CPU address to phys_addr_t
> >>       sh/PCI: Pass GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE CPU & bus address to dma_declare_coherent_memory()
> >>       iommu/exynos: Remove unnecessary "&" from function pointers
> > 
> > Applied patches 1-3 to my core branch and patch 4 to the arm/exynos
> > branch. Patch 3 doesn't really belong into my tree, please let me know
> > if there are any objections against it being there and I'll drop it.
> 
> I was thinking that either Bjorn or I should merge patches 1 and 2.

Okay, fine with me. Then I drop 1-3 entirely and only keep patch 4 in
the exynos branch.


	Joerg


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/