lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 20:26:10 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] tracing: accelerate tracing filters with BPF On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2014 19:55:11 -0700 > Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote: > >> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig >> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig >> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ config FTRACE_NMI_ENTER >> default y >> >> config EVENT_TRACING >> + depends on NET >> select CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER >> bool >> > > This part makes me a little nervous. I know a lot of embedded devices > depend on tracing, but do they all have network? I think we may want to split BPF into its own config, since it doesn't really depend on anything in net. > They may, but I would like to hear from others in the embedded space. > > -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists