linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 19/19] mm: filemap: Avoid unnecessary barries and waitqueue lookups in unlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 May 2014 18:17:55 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/19] mm: filemap: Avoid unnecessary barries and
 waitqueue lookups in unlock_page fastpath

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 06:11:52PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> The subsequent discussion was "off-topic", and it seems that the patch
> itself needs a bit more discussion,
> 
> On 05/13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:53:13PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:45:50AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > >  void unlock_page(struct page *page)
> > > >  {
> > > > +	wait_queue_head_t *wqh = clear_page_waiters(page);
> > > > +
> > > >  	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * No additional barrier needed due to clear_bit_unlock barriering all updates
> > > > +	 * before waking waiters
> > > > +	 */
> > > >  	clear_bit_unlock(PG_locked, &page->flags);
> > > > -	smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> > > > -	wake_up_page(page, PG_locked);
> > >
> > > This is wrong.
> 
> Yes,
> 
> > > The smp_mb__after_clear_bit() is still required to ensure
> > > that the cleared bit is visible before the wakeup on all architectures.
> 
> But note that "the cleared bit is visible before the wakeup" is confusing.
> I mean, we do not need mb() before __wake_up(). We need it only because
> __wake_up_bit() checks waitqueue_active().
> 
> 
> And at least
> 
> 	fs/cachefiles/namei.c:cachefiles_delete_object()
> 	fs/block_dev.c:blkdev_get()
> 	kernel/signal.c:task_clear_jobctl_trapping()
> 	security/keys/gc.c:key_garbage_collector()
> 
> look obviously wrong.
> 
> I would be happy to send the fix, but do I need to split it per-file?
> Given that it is trivial, perhaps I can send a single patch?

Since its all the same issue a single patch would be fine I think.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped