lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2014 08:37:45 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] fs: print a message when freezing/unfreezing
 filesystems

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:00:52AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:39:45PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 14-05-14 13:26:21, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 01:14:49PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Wed 14-05-14 00:04:43, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > > This helps hang troubleshooting efforts when only dmesg is available.
> > > > > 
> > > > > While here remove code duplication with MS_RDONLY case and fix a
> > > > > whitespace nit.
> > > >   I'm somewhat undecided here I have to say. On one hand I don't like
> > > > printing to kernel log when everything is fine and kernel is operating
> > > > normally. On the other hand I've seen quite a few cases where people have
> > > > shot themselves in the foot with filesystem freezing so having some trace
> > > > of this in the log doesn't seem like a completely bad thing either. What do
> > > > other people think?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I would like to note that the kernel already prints messages when e.g.
> > > filesystems get mounted.
> >   Yeah, that's a fair point.
> 
> But filesystems choose to output that info, not the VFS. When you do
> a remount,ro there is no output in syslog, because filesystems don't
> need to dump any output - the state change is reflected in
> /proc/self/mounts. IMO frozen should state should be communicated
> the same way so that it is silent when it just works, and the state
> can easily be determined when something goes wrong.

Say, like this:

$ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
/dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
$ sudo xfs_freeze -f /mnt/test
$ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
/dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,frozen,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
$ sudo xfs_freeze -u /mnt/test
$ grep /mnt/test /proc/mounts
/dev/vda /mnt/test xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
$

Patch below does this.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com

fs: report frozen state in /proc/mounts

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>

So people can tell if a filesystem is frozen easily, add the
freezing state to the /proc/mount output for the given superblock.
To help diagnose freezing hangs as opposed to frozen filesystems,
differentiate between the states of "freezing" and "frozen" in the
output.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
---
 fs/proc_namespace.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc_namespace.c b/fs/proc_namespace.c
index 1a81373..0ec4b56 100644
--- a/fs/proc_namespace.c
+++ b/fs/proc_namespace.c
@@ -53,6 +53,20 @@ static int show_sb_opts(struct seq_file *m, struct super_block *sb)
 			seq_puts(m, fs_infop->str);
 	}
 
+	switch (sb->s_writers.frozen) {
+	case SB_FREEZE_WRITE:
+	case SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT:
+	case SB_FREEZE_FS:
+		seq_puts(m, ",freezing");
+		break;
+	case SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE:
+		seq_puts(m, ",frozen");
+		break;
+	case SB_UNFROZEN:
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
 	return security_sb_show_options(m, sb);
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ