linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/10] thermal: exynos: remove redundant threshold_code checks from exynos_tmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 May 2014 11:20:51 +0530
From:	Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc:	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] thermal: exynos: remove redundant threshold_code
 checks from exynos_tmu_initialize()

On 5/5/14, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> wrote:
> Remove runtime checks for negative return values of temp_to_code()
> from exynos_tmu_initialize().  The current level temperature data
> hardcoded in pdata will never cause a negative temp_to_code()
> return values and for the new code potential mistakes should be
> caught during development/review phases.
Your arguments looks fine.
>
> Theres should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>

> ---
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 16 +---------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 789d745..a415829 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -170,10 +170,6 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  	if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210) {
>  		/* Write temperature code for threshold */
>  		threshold_code = temp_to_code(data, pdata->threshold);
> -		if (threshold_code < 0) {
> -			ret = threshold_code;
> -			goto out;
> -		}
>  		writeb(threshold_code,
>  			data->base + reg->threshold_temp);
>  		for (i = 0; i < trigger_levs; i++)
> @@ -187,18 +183,12 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>  		i < trigger_levs && i < EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG; i++) {
>  			threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
>  						pdata->trigger_levels[i]);
> -			if (threshold_code < 0) {
> -				ret = threshold_code;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
>  			rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>  			if (pdata->threshold_falling) {
>  				threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
>  						pdata->trigger_levels[i] -
>  						pdata->threshold_falling);
> -				if (threshold_code > 0)
> -					falling_threshold |=
> -						threshold_code << 8 * i;
> +				falling_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
>  			}
>  		}
>
> @@ -217,10 +207,6 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  				(pdata->trigger_type[i] == HW_TRIP)) {
>  			threshold_code = temp_to_code(data,
>  						pdata->trigger_levels[i]);
> -			if (threshold_code < 0) {
> -				ret = threshold_code;
> -				goto out;
> -			}
>  			if (i == EXYNOS_MAX_TRIGGER_PER_REG - 1) {
>  				/* 1-4 level to be assigned in th0 reg */
>  				rising_threshold |= threshold_code << 8 * i;
> --
> 1.8.2.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/