| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:13:36 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Feng Kan <fkan@....com>
Cc: "tglx\@linutronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches\@apm.com" <patches@....com>, jason@...edaemon.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: gic: replace hex numbers with defines.
[adding Jason Cooper to the mix, as he's ramping up on the GIC
stuff... ;-)]
On Fri, May 16 2014 at 11:20:12 pm BST, Feng Kan <fkan@....com> wrote:
> This is to cleanup some hex numbers used in the code and replace
> then with defines to make the code cleaner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <apatel@....com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 57d165e..e6698a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,20 @@
>
> #include "irqchip.h"
>
> +#define GIC_DIST_ENABLE 0x1
> +#define GIC_DIST_DISABLE 0x0
> +#define GIC_CPU_ENABLE 0x1
> +#define GIC_CPU_DISABLE 0x0
> +#define GIC_INT_ID_MASK 0x3ff
> +#define GIC_INT_DEF_PRI 0xa0
> +#define GIC_INT_DEF_PRI_MASK ((GIC_INT_DEF_PRI << 24) |\
> + (GIC_INT_DEF_PRI << 16) |\
> + (GIC_INT_DEF_PRI << 8) | GIC_INT_DEF_PRI)
This is not a mask, but the interrupt priority for 4 interrupts.
> +#define GIC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD 0xf0
> +#define GIC_INT_DISABLE_MASK 0xffffffff
This is not a mask to disable interrupt, but rather a mask for for 32
interrupts addressed by a single register. The action (enable or
disable) depends on the register you're writting to.
> +#define GIC_INT_SGI_MASK 0x0000ffff
> +#define GIC_INT_LVL_TRIGGER 0x0
> +
> union gic_base {
> void __iomem *common_base;
> void __percpu * __iomem *percpu_base;
> @@ -291,7 +305,7 @@ static void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> do {
> irqstat = readl_relaxed(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
> - irqnr = irqstat & ~0x1c00;
> + irqnr = irqstat & GIC_INT_ID_MASK;
>
> if (likely(irqnr > 15 && irqnr < 1021)) {
> irqnr = irq_find_mapping(gic->domain, irqnr);
> @@ -322,7 +336,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> status = readl_relaxed(gic_data_cpu_base(chip_data) + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
> raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>
> - gic_irq = (status & 0x3ff);
> + gic_irq = (status & GIC_INT_ID_MASK);
> if (gic_irq == 1023)
You could define this one as GIC_INT_SPURIOUS.
> goto out;
>
> @@ -384,13 +398,14 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
> void __iomem *base = gic_data_dist_base(gic);
>
> - writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_DIST_DISABLE, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
>
> /*
> * Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
> */
> for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
> - writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4 / 16);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_LVL_TRIGGER,
> + base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4 / 16);
>
> /*
> * Set all global interrupts to this CPU only.
> @@ -405,16 +420,18 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> * Set priority on all global interrupts.
> */
> for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 4)
> - writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_DEF_PRI_MASK,
> + base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
>
> /*
> * Disable all interrupts. Leave the PPI and SGIs alone
> * as these enables are banked registers.
> */
> for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 32)
> - writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_DISABLE_MASK,
> + base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
>
> - writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_DIST_ENABLE, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> }
>
> static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> @@ -443,23 +460,24 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> * Deal with the banked PPI and SGI interrupts - disable all
> * PPI interrupts, ensure all SGI interrupts are enabled.
> */
> - writel_relaxed(0xffff0000, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR);
> - writel_relaxed(0x0000ffff, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET);
> + writel_relaxed(~GIC_INT_SGI_MASK, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR);
Not quite. 0xffff0000 descibe the PPIs. It is not the opposite of the
set of SGIs.
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_SGI_MASK, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET);
>
> /*
> * Set priority on PPI and SGI interrupts
> */
> for (i = 0; i < 32; i += 4)
> - writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_DEF_PRI_MASK,
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
>
> - writel_relaxed(0xf0, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> - writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_CPU_ENABLE, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> }
>
> void gic_cpu_if_down(void)
> {
> void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(&gic_data[0]);
> - writel_relaxed(0, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_CPU_DISABLE, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> @@ -519,14 +537,14 @@ static void gic_dist_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
> if (!dist_base)
> return;
>
> - writel_relaxed(0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_DIST_DISABLE, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
>
> for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(gic_irqs, 16); i++)
> writel_relaxed(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_spi_conf[i],
> dist_base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4);
>
> for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(gic_irqs, 4); i++)
> - writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0,
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_DEF_PRI_MASK,
> dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
>
> for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(gic_irqs, 4); i++)
> @@ -537,7 +555,7 @@ static void gic_dist_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
> writel_relaxed(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_spi_enable[i],
> dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + i * 4);
>
> - writel_relaxed(1, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_DIST_ENABLE, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> }
>
> static void gic_cpu_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
> @@ -591,10 +609,11 @@ static void gic_cpu_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
> writel_relaxed(ptr[i], dist_base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4);
>
> for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(32, 4); i++)
> - writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_DEF_PRI_MASK,
> + dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4);
>
> - writel_relaxed(0xf0, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> - writel_relaxed(1, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> + writel_relaxed(GIC_CPU_ENABLE, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> }
>
> static int gic_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *v)
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists