linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/26] perf tools: Introduce struct hist_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 May 2014 20:44:25 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
	Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] perf tools: Introduce struct hist_entry_iter

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:03:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> There're some duplicate code when adding hist entries.  They are
> different in that some have branch info or mem info but generally do
> same thing.  So introduce new struct hist_entry_iter and add callbacks
> to customize each case in general way.
> 
> The new perf_evsel__add_entry() function will look like:
> 
>   iter->prepare_entry();
>   iter->add_single_entry();
> 
>   while (iter->next_entry())
>     iter->add_next_entry();
> 
>   iter->finish_entry();
> 
> This will help further work like the cumulative callchain patchset.
> 
> Tested-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
> Tested-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-report.c     | 194 +++----------------------
>  tools/perf/tests/hists_filter.c |  18 +--
>  tools/perf/tests/hists_output.c |  11 +-
>  tools/perf/util/hist.c          | 303 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/hist.h          |  33 +++++
>  5 files changed, 371 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> index bc0eec1ce4be..d224f5961faa 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> @@ -76,165 +76,6 @@ static int report__config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
>  	return perf_default_config(var, value, cb);
>  }
>  
> -static void report__inc_stats(struct report *rep, struct hist_entry *he)
> -{
> -	/*
> -	 * The @he is either of a newly created one or an existing one
> -	 * merging current sample.  We only want to count a new one so
> -	 * checking ->nr_events being 1.
> -	 */
> -	if (he->stat.nr_events == 1)
> -		rep->nr_entries++;
> -

hm.. above is report specific counter update

while below code is repeated for each iterator in finish_entry,
maybe we should separated this and put below into a function
called from generic part

> -	/*
> -	 * Only counts number of samples at this stage as it's more
> -	 * natural to do it here and non-sample events are also
> -	 * counted in perf_session_deliver_event().  The dump_trace
> -	 * requires this info is ready before going to the output tree.
> -	 */
> -	hists__inc_nr_events(he->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
> -	if (!he->filtered)
> -		he->hists->stats.nr_non_filtered_samples++;
> -}

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/