[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 21:43:47 +0200
From: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: jet.chen@...el.com, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: [jet.chen@...el.com: [bio] kernel BUG at
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c:166!]
Hi Jens,
looks like that commit 3979ef4dcf3d1de55a560a3a4016c30a835df44d ("bio-modify-__bio_add_page-to-accept-pages-that-dont-start-a-new-segment-v3")
introduces a regression, as reported by Jet Chan.
Do you have any idea about the possible problem with this patch?
it is the one that performs a recount of the segments in case of failure in __bio_add_page()
http://www.spinics.net/lists/mm-commits/msg103684.html
I would not be surprised if the bug was introduced by fceb38f36f, because it
contained a mystake that commit 3979ef4dcf supposedly fixed.
But learning that commit 3979ef4dcf is introducing a regression leaves
me quite puzzled.
Thanks,
Maurizio Lombardi
Content of type "message/rfc822" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists