linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the devicetree tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 May 2014 09:22:37 +0200
From:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the devicetree tree

Dear Stephen Rothwell,

On Mon, 26 May 2014 15:05:57 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 395ee2b3146d..03e7fc6c93e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -1901,10 +1901,6 @@ int of_update_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *newprop)
>  	if (!of_kset)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	/* At early boot, bail out and defer setup to of_init() */
> -	if (!of_kset)
> -		return found ? 0 : -ENODEV;
> -

Seems like this is in fact reverting my change entirely, so maybe Grant
should drop my patch instead?

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/