linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 May 2014 18:30:11 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip

On 05/27/2014 04:21 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> OK this version applied worked fine.

Thank you.

> Please check the result because I had to rebase it a little.

Looks good. What remains in my queue is:

* gpio: dwapb: use irq_linear_revmap() for the faster lookup
* gpio: dwapb: use irq_gc_lock() for locking instead bc's lock
* gpio: dwapb: use d->mask instead of BIT(bit)

what do we do about those?

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/