lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2014 06:32:16 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] sched/fair.c: remove "power" from struct
 numa_stats

On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 23:18 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: 
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 18:19 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: 
> > > 
> > > @@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ static void update_numa_stats(struct numa_stats *ns, int nid)
> > >  
> > >  		ns->nr_running += rq->nr_running;
> > >  		ns->load += weighted_cpuload(cpu);
> > > -		ns->power += power_of(cpu);
> > > +		ns->compute_capacity += power_of(cpu);
> > 
> > power_of(cpu) as a capacity input looks odd now.. 
> > 
> > > @@ -1062,9 +1062,10 @@ static void update_numa_stats(struct numa_stats *ns, int nid)
> > >  	if (!cpus)
> > >  		return;
> > >  
> > > -	ns->load = (ns->load * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) / ns->power;
> > > -	ns->capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(ns->power, SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
> > > -	ns->has_capacity = (ns->nr_running < ns->capacity);
> > > +	ns->load = (ns->load * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) / ns->compute_capacity;
> > > +	ns->task_capacity =
> > > +		DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(ns->compute_capacity, SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
> > 
> > ..as do SCHED_POWER_SCALE, update_cpu_power() etc.
> 
> The rest is renamed in a later patch.  I wanted to split it into 
> multiple patches to keep those changes manageable.

I don't see a lot of benefit in creating intermediate inconsistencies vs
one bulk rename, but it does make smaller patches, so never mind.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ