linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/27] mtd: nand: introduce function to fix a common bug in most nand-drivers not showing a device in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 14:49:21 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] mtd: nand: introduce function to fix a common bug
 in most nand-drivers not showing a device in sysfs

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:09:05PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> I'm very sorry, but I find such discussions extremly tiresome.
> 
> If you just would have suggested that one if to prevent that someone who
> doesn't c&p existing code would end up with a clobbered name (which he
> obviously can't miss if he ever would test his new or changed driver),
> than I maybe would have send a v2 with that if. But all the other noise
> just made me to want I never had send (again) a patch to LKML. It is
> almost impossible to avoid such answers and it turns every patch posting
> into a endless story where people do want to discuss every line or even
> character of totally silly things.

It would help if you brought a more open attitude to the table.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/14/574
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/