linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/11] net: wireless: Remove useless return variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 31 May 2014 23:23:51 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
Cc:	Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/11] net: wireless: Remove useless return variables

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:14:06AM -0300, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_cmn.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_cmn.c
> index b0fd807..57ecc05 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_cmn.c
> @@ -1538,11 +1538,7 @@ static s8
>  wlc_user_txpwr_antport_to_rfport(struct brcms_phy *pi, uint chan, u32 band,
>  				 u8 rate)
>  {
> -	s8 offset = 0;
> -
> -	if (!pi->user_txpwr_at_rfport)
> -		return offset;
> -	return offset;
> +	return 0;
>  }

The original code looks buggy.  I wonder what it was supposed to do?

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/