linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Qualcomm Resource Power Manager driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:01:01 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
Cc:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Qualcomm Resource Power Manager driver

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:15:24AM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:

> > Lately I've been working on rpm, rpm-smd, smem, smd, smsm, smp2p
> > patches for mainline.
> > It could be argued that smd is a bus and should go in drivers/bus, but
> > for the rest I fear that we just created drivers/soc/qcom as another
> > dumping ground for things; a "Qualcomm specific drivers/mfd".

> Do we have some obstacles to not use a "common mailbox framework" for
> this IPC (shared memory) communication. It looks that it fits very well
> with our needs for this rpm-regulator and future submitting of smd driver?

Jassi (CCed) has been working on just such a thing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)